Suggested additions to make a nameplate when the sticky notes are enormous.

2019-04-24

Neither the author nor the editor thought it was a problem, though. This was because they were both too good at Japanese to notice.

So, illustration.

https://gyazo.com/93aca534b3d2d01f42bff9583a62b49a

First, there are 600 sticky notes (a)

Take out 150 pieces as enough to list (B)

The rest is 450(c)

Group formation for B

Let's say 25 groups of about 5 pieces are created (D).

25 pieces(e) remaining.

Bundling groups of 25 pieces, each with its own faceplate, gives an apparent number of 25 pieces (F).

E and F together 50 (G)

Replenish to get to 150 sheets, the amount that can be listed as space is available.

Take 100 from 450 C (H)

The remaining 350(i)

Join H to G to make 150 pieces (J)

In response to this, make the same grouping as you did for B

This method is not the "only best method" but only "one method the author used in making this book.

In the process of creating this diagram, I came up with several variations, so let's compare and consider them.

For ease of reference, we will refer to this method as Method 1.

Explanation of Method 2

https://gyazo.com/b6abc96fb4b08c24a7d7585a27492cfc

Same as method 1 up to F

First, there are 600 sticky notes (a)

Take out 150 pieces as enough to list (B)

The rest is 450(c)

Group formation for B

Let's say 25 groups of about 5 pieces are created (D).

25 pieces(e) remaining.

Bundling groups of 25 pieces, each with its own faceplate, gives an apparent number of 25 pieces (F).

Replenish so that the amount to be listed with F is 150 sheets.

In response to this, make the same grouping as you did for B

Since E is a "sticky note that we tried to group together once and did not come together well," the idea of setting it aside is natural. Before discussing this method 2, I will also introduce method 3.

Explanation of Method 3

https://gyazo.com/b8a66b3d5e3f6ced5eeb868cf01a3644

Same as method 1 up to F

First, there are 600 sticky notes (a)

Take out 150 pieces as enough to list (B)

The rest is 450(c)

Group formation for B

Let's say 25 groups of about 5 pieces are created (D).

25 pieces(e) remaining.

Bundling groups of 25 pieces, each with its own faceplate, gives an apparent number of 25 pieces (F).

Take out 150 sheets from C

In response to this, make the same grouping as you did for B

This leaves aside both E and F. It is easy to give a reason. Both E and F are stickies that have gone through the grouping phase once. It is not right to mix them with stickies that have not yet gone through the grouping phase. If you want, you can divide the 600 stickies into four groups of 150 stickies each.

The procedure is simple, and if you think about it in your head, using method 3 may seem like the best way to go.

Why didn't I use method 3? After thinking about it for a bit, I figured out why.

During the second grouping phase, you will say, "Oh, I saw a sticky note before that might be related to this sticky note. At this point, where is that "sticky I saw before"? If it is Method 3, it may not exist in the sticky you are currently listing.

The feeling of "I think I saw a sticky note that might be related to something, what kind of sticky note was it?" is recorded by finding the sticky note and arranging it on the side. This "finding" becomes difficult.

Unlike computers, humans cannot process "forget about the sticky note that has been processed.

One might think, "Let's move aside what has been processed," but the human brain is not capable of such processing.

Therefore, method 3, despite its apparent simplicity, becomes complicated in practice because of the "need to refer again to what has been moved out of the way. For the same reason, the same problem can occur with method 2.

Let's say, for example, that we interrupt this process and have some time to spare. In that case, the probability is high that you will have forgotten about the stickies you worked on, so a good option would be to "leave aside the ones you have already processed and just do the ones you have not yet processed" as in Method 3.

In this light, it may be a good idea to "order by most recently written" even when taking out the 150 sheets in the first place. This is because the more recently written, the more likely it is to be remembered.

---